October 2025 Crypto Crash: A Necessary Deleveraging and Market Reset

Summary of the October 2025 Crypto Crash:

The October 2025 crypto crash sent shockwaves through the market as over $19 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated within hours (Oct 10–11), marking one of the largest single-day wipeouts in crypto history. Bitcoin plunged more than 14% to around US$104,782, while Ethereum dropped roughly 12%, according to Reuters, Bloomberg, and DL News. Smaller altcoins suffered even steeper declines—many tumbling 40–70% before staging partial recoveries.

The weekend of October 10–12, 2025, will be remembered as a brutal yet illuminating case study that transcended a simple market correction. What began as a geopolitical tremor quickly evolved into a full-scale financial earthquake, leaving the crypto market shaken and many traders devastated.

While headlines focused on the dramatic losses, a deeper forensic analysis reveals that this was not a mere crash but a painful—yet necessary—deleveraging event that reshaped the market’s trajectory and exposed critical infrastructure vulnerabilities.

This was not a random act of chaos but rather a predictable consequence of an overheated market colliding with a systemic shock.

The Confluence of Catalysts

The primary trigger for the market’s freefall was a tweet from U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday, October 10, threatening a 100% tariff on all Chinese imports and imposing new export controls on critical software. 

This announcement, which followed a recent decision by China to restrict rare earth mineral exports, reignited the U.S.-China trade war fears and sent a shockwave through global financial markets. While traditional markets were closed for the weekend, the 24/7 nature of the crypto market meant it bore the immediate brunt of the panic.

Hidden Leverage and On-Chain Signals

But the geopolitical news was merely the match that lit the fire. The market’s pre-existing condition—an environment of extreme and, in many cases, hidden leverage—was the kindling. On-chain data and exchange-order-book analysis from platforms like Glassnode and CoinGlass paint a clear and concerning picture. 

Prior to the crash, aggregate open interest on major cryptocurrencies had skyrocketed to unprecedented levels, a significant divergence from the overall market capitalization. For instance, open interest on Bitcoin and Solana had grown by an astonishing 374% and 205%, respectively, since the start of the year. This data pointed to a market not just bullish but precariously overleveraged and ripe for a correction.

Largest Liquidation Event in Crypto History

When the geopolitical news hit, it ignited a domino effect. The ensuing cascade of liquidations saw a staggering $19 billion in leveraged positions wiped out in just 24 hours, with some estimates suggesting the actual figure is much higher. 

This event is now cemented as the single largest liquidation event in crypto history, surpassing the scale of the FTX collapse and other previous market drawdowns. Over 1.6 million trading accounts were financially decimated, or “rekt,” in market vernacular, a sobering testament to the dangers of high-leverage trading without robust risk management.

FAQ: What is Rekt in crypto?

In crypto, “Rekt” is slang for “wrecked.” It means suffering a major financial loss—usually when a trader’s position gets liquidated or a token’s value crashes.

Example: “He went all in on leverage and got rekt during the crash.”

It’s commonly used to describe losing big due to poor risk management or sudden market moves.

Unpacking the Market Dynamics behind the Crypto Crash

The losses were widespread, demonstrating the interconnectedness of the ecosystem. While Bitcoin’s drop of approximately 13% from its all-time high of over $126,000 was significant, the pain was most acute in the altcoin and DeFi sectors. Tokens like Solana, Sui, and popular memecoins saw their values plummet by 40% or more in minutes. 

This was not a broad-based spot sell-off but a mechanical, forced deleveraging event. On-chain analytics showed that liquidity, which is already thinner in the weekend hours, evaporated in an instant as market makers pulled their quotes. 

This created a vicious cycle: thin order books meant that forced liquidations had an outsized impact on price, which in turn triggered more liquidations, fueling a self-reinforcing cascade.

Insider Whale Activity Sparks Market Integrity Concerns

The sell-off also raised serious questions about market integrity. The timing of an anonymous “insider whale” who allegedly placed a massive short position on Bitcoin and Ethereum just minutes before the Trump announcement came under intense scrutiny. 

While such claims are difficult to prove, they do highlight the need for greater transparency and market integrity, which can only be achieved through institutional-grade compliance and risk management tools.

The Path Forward: Resilience and Opportunity

From a macro perspective, the most compelling takeaway is not the crash itself, but the resilience that followed. The swift rebound of Bitcoin and Ethereum on Monday was a powerful signal. The recovery was not driven by retail FOMO (fear of missing out), but by institutional buying. 

Recent reports show that institutional investors are increasingly allocating capital to digital assets, with a strong preference for regulated products and robust infrastructure. They viewed this liquidation event not as a harbinger of a bear market but as a prime opportunity to acquire fundamentally strong assets at a discount, providing a crucial liquidity injection that stabilized the market. 

This influx of sophisticated capital, a trend that has been accelerating throughout 2025, underscores the maturing nature of the asset class.

Final thought

This event, while painful for many, served a vital purpose. It purged the system of excessive risk and unsustainable leverage, clearing the path for a healthier, more mature market. This crash was not a death knell but a rite of passage, a stress test that the digital asset ecosystem absorbed and rebounded from. 

It proved that despite its volatility, the crypto market has evolved to a point where it can withstand a shock of this magnitude, a testament to its evolving infrastructure and growing appeal to sophisticated capital.

The future of finance is increasingly digital, and building a foundation that can withstand such volatility is not just a strategic advantage but a necessity for all market participants.

 

Share this article :

Speak to our experts

Tell us what you're interested in

Select the solutions you'd like to explore further.

When are you looking to implement the above solution(s)?

Do you have an investment range in mind for the solution(s)?

Remarks

Subscribe to The Latest Industry Insights

Explore more

Web3 & Emerging Innovations
Financial Institutions & Enterprise Solutions

Ooi Sang Kuang

Chairman, Non-Executive Director

Mr. Ooi is the former Chairman of the Board of Directors of OCBC Bank, Singapore. He served as a Special Advisor in Bank Negara Malaysia and, prior to that, was the Deputy Governor and a Member of the Board of Directors.

ChainUp: Leading Provider of Digital Asset Exchange & Custody Solutions
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.